Context An affordable, user-friendly fertility monitoring tool remains an unmet need. While calendar based methods offer an appealing solution their accuracy is questionable, espicially given the variablitiy of the menstrual cycle length. Hence, methods that rely on physiological parameters reflecting the fertile window represent a more consistent predictor. Objective We examine in this study the correlation between pulse rate (PR) and the menstrual phases using wrist-worn PR sensors, and whether PR could be used to identify the fertility window Patient(s) 41 healthy, non-pregnant women, between 22-42 years old Methods A 1-year prospective-observational study. Intervention(s) Pulse rate was recorded using wrist worn photoplethysmographic sensors during sleep under normal living conditions. Main Outcome Measure(s) The primary outcome is ovulation based on self-administered urine test (Clearblue digital ovulation test). Results 155 ovulatory cycles were recorded from 33 eligible women, with a mean length of 29 days (±9). We observed a significant increase in the median PR during the fertile window compared to the menstrual phase (1.7 beats per minute, p-value<.01). Moreover, the median PR during the mid-luteal phase was also significantly elevated compared to the fertile window (1.7 beats per minute, p<.01), and the menstrual phase (3.4 beats per minute, p<.01). The associations were robust to adjusting for the collected behavioral and nutritional covariates. Conclusions There is a significant increase in nocturnal pulse rate correlating with the fertile window, which is robust to the inter- and intra-person variability of menstrual cycle length, behavioral, and nutritional profiles. Hence, PR monitoring using wearable sensors could be used as one parameter within a multi-parameter fertility awareness method.